India Hits Pause on Full Trade Deal, Awaits Clearer U.S. Policy Under Trump
India has taken a cautious approach to completing a comprehensive trade agreement with the United States while the world observes the changing tides of international trade and diplomacy. With Donald Trump again shaping America’s policy direction, New Delhi is treading carefully—waiting for clarity before making every long-term agreements.
This strategic waiting is
not unnecessary. The India-U.S. trade relationship is massive, complex, and
highly politicized, and this is especially so in Washington. Given Trump's
track record of erratic trade policy, ranging from threats of tariffs to renegotiation
of agreements that are already in place, Indian policymakers are deciding to
wait before they act.
A Potential Deal—But Not
Just Now
Over the past decade,
India and the U.S. have importantly deepened their economic ties. In 2023,
bilateral trade was valued at over $190 billion, and both country have stated
their desire to increase that amount to above $500 billion. However, a comprehensive
trade interact that addresses digital trade, investment safeguards, goods, and
services has now to materialize.
Conversations are still
random, with several rounds of discussions resulting in incremental gains but
no large agreement. Now, with the potential of Donald Trump sitting in the
White House—or at least having important influence in the Republican party—again,
the Indian government is seen to be resetting its next moves.
Why the Caution?
India's reluctance to
leap into a complete interact can be explained by several perspectives:
Policy Volatility in the
U.S.
Under Trump's first term,
the U.S. pulled out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, applied tariffs to steel
and aluminum (including to allies) and became more transactional in terms of
international trade. For India, this meant uncertainty and a harder line on
trade concessions.
Points of Stress in
Bilateral Relationships
Pivotal issues are still
in limbo: U.S. insistence on agricultural market access and medical devices,
India's position on data localization, and visa limits that concern Indian
professionals. A comprehensive interact would involve progress on these politically
charged dossiers—something India is reluctant to put money on since it lacks
insight into the tenor of the upcoming U.S. government.
Strategic Autonomy
India has come to focus
more on "Atmanirbhar Bharat" (self-reliant India) and has been wary
of entering into trade agreements that will undermine domestic industries. By
playing hard to get, India maintains the leverage to negotiate on its own terms,
especially if the U.S. comes in seeking hard concessions.
Trump Factor: Risk or
Opportunity?
The Trump element
complicates things. His "America First" approach usually came into
conflict with multilateralism and brought unplanned to international trade.
Even though India and the United States had a cordial relationship in his first
term in office, Indian exporters suffered when the United States lost India's
GSP (Generalized System of Preferences) designation.
If Trump becomes
president again in 2025, trade policies may again flip suddenly, especially if
he doubles up on tariffs or insists on better terms for American businesses.
India's wait-and-watch strategy is thus not only diplomatic—but realistic.
But it is further to be
noted that Trump has heaped praise on India repeatedly and has people chemistry
with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This provides a choice for a more loose
bilateral interact, if both sides are made to close their differences pragmatically.
Interim Solutions on the
Table
Instead than rushing to a
broad trade interact, the two country are turning their attention to narrower,
sectoral pacts and confidence-building measures. The last few weeks have seen
India and the U.S. have collaborated on lowering tariffs, simplifying semiconductor
cooperation, and increasing defense technology transfers.
These gestures signal a
turn to sectoral collaboration, which is perhaps the safer bet until political
clarity re-emerges in Washington. For corporations, this provides short-term
relief and possible avenues to larger involvement without the straitjacket of
having to drive a mega-deal.
What's Next?
India will probable go on
to interact with the U.S. administration—be it this or every future one—but at
a pace and depth commensurate with the tone established by following U.S.
policy. Unless there is larger predictability in Washington, especially on trade
issues, New Delhi will continue to emphasize domestic economic reforms,
diversifying its trade alliances, and laying the groundwork for future talks.
Meanwhile, Indian
industry captains and exporters are further being told to maintain agility.
Trade streams are already changing due to global realities like supply-chain
disruptions and geopolitical concerns. From pharmaceuticals to technology to
textiles, Indian companies may have to be made for spur-of-the-moment
changes—both in terms of legislation and the Chances.
Comments
Post a Comment